Conference Evaluation

Breakout Session - Medicaid and Under Served Communities Objective: - Describe strategies for working with Medicaid and other underserved populations.  Key  5=Excellent 4=Very Good 3=Good 2=Fair 1=Poor N=Does Not Apply Check the number of the rating that best describes your opinion about the following: 1. Your achievement of the objective. 3.9 2. The relevance of the session to your work. 4.2 3. The appropriateness of teaching strategies. 3.9 Breakout Session - Clinical Practice Update Objective: - Describe strategies for adhering to appropriate prescribing guidelines in clinical practice.  Key  5=Excellent 4=Very Good 3=Good 2=Fair 1=Poor N=Does Not Apply Check the number of the rating that best describes your opinion about the following: 1. Your achievement of the objective. 4.5 2. The relevance of the session to your work. 4.5 3. The appropriateness of teaching strategies. 4.5 Plenary Session - Ethnic Communities Sunday, 8:45am - 10:30am Objective: a) Describe how antibiotic use varies among ethnic groups. b) Describe strategies for involving ethnic community-based organizations in efforts to promote appropriate antibiotic use.  Key  5=Excellent 4=Very Good 3=Good 2=Fair 1=Poor N=Does Not Apply Check the number of the rating that best describes your opinion about the following: 1. Your achievement of the objective. 4.2 2. Your achievement of objective b. 4.2 3. The relevance of the session to your work. 4.2 4. The appropriateness of teaching strategies. 4.3 Overall Evaluation: The goals of this conference included: 1. Expand the partnership approach of existing and new antibiotic resistance projects. 2. Increase the level of interest about the issue of antibiotic resistance and increase commitment to take action. 3. Increase the involvement of physician, health provider and consumer organizations in efforts to increase appropriate antibiotic use. 4. Expand the knowledge and understanding of how antibiotic resistance and antibiotic use are impacted by culture, ethnicity and economic status, especially in the Latino community and among Medicaid recipients.  Key  5=Excellent 4=Very Good 3=Good 2=Fair 1=Poor N=Does Not Apply Check the number of the rating that best describes your opinion about the following: 1. The meeting was well organized. 4.9 2. The objectives were relevant to the purpose of the meeting. 4.8 3. The physical facilities were conducive to learning. 4.5 4. The structure of the meeting was appropriate for networking and establishing partnerships. 4.7 Comments: Great conference. New content and new passion for me! I can't wait to see how we can fold this work into Health Child Care America. Conference - very thought provoking - great networking - info-sharing opportunities. Great conference! The planning shows! Nice locations and amenities, well-organized topics - but I especially liked the focus on communication. Thanks. Congratulations on a well-organized meeting. I am so pleased that I could attend this conference. I will return to Oregon inspired. I would make the breakout sessions only 1.5 hours; I think 2 hours was too long. The meeting provided opportunities to network with other states and panel discussions were very helpful. This is one of the best meetings I have ever attended! Only attended Sunday - Heard great things re: Sat. - Sunday Plenary and State Meetings well done! One helpful idea to improve collaboration between speakers is to have a list of projects that are planned or active at that point for different coalitions and try to share between these coalitions the information. This will improve the networking between different coalitions. The rooms were very cold. However, staff was responsive in making changes. Make breakout sessions shorter so you can have 3 sessions. This was the best conference yet. Thank you. Unfortunately few medical societies came. It might have been better to attach to a national meeting of medical societies or get AMA as a cosponsor.

« Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next Page »